Technical Leader: How to Build Authority and a Culture of Accountability Within the Team?
Maintenance performance does not depend only on procedures and tools, but above all on people.
The technical leader (Director, Manager, Supervisor) sets the direction, builds trust, and ensures that accountability becomes a shared value. Without this, even the best system remains on paper.
The Environment of the Maintenance Leader
In many organizations, the role of the technical leader is confused with that of a “chief specialist.” Yet authority does not stem solely from technical expertise, but from the ability to build a team, define priorities, and shape culture. When a leader cannot align people around a common goal, typical symptoms appear: lack of accountability, blame shifting, and planning chaos.
The Maintenance team operates at the intersection of multiple interests: production wants availability, finance wants costs under control, and engineering wants safety. The leader acts as a translator between these worlds, which is why their role directly affects business performance. If the focus remains only on current breakdowns, the organization loses its long-term perspective and fails to build stability.
In practice, an effective Leader is one who speaks the language of consequences, not just activities. Executives do not need to know how many work orders were completed; they need to understand how this impacts risk, availability, and cost. This way of communicating builds trust and makes it easier to justify investments in prevention, systems, or modernization. When a Leader communicates this way, the technical department stops being perceived as a “cost center” and becomes a business partner.
The Psychological Dimension of the Maintenance Leader
The psychological aspect is equally important. People in Maintenance often work under time pressure and high responsibility, which can lead to burnout and routine-driven behavior. A Leader who creates a safe environment for reporting problems and learning from mistakes increases the effectiveness of the entire team. It is in such conditions that a culture of accountability is built, not a culture of fear.
It is worth remembering that a culture of accountability does not emerge overnight. It requires consistent signals that standards are more important than short-term “heroic” actions. It is the leader’s role to maintain that consistency.
The authority of a technical leader is built in two areas: professional competence and internal consistency. The team observes whether the leader enforces small matters consistently: on-time inspections, quality of failure descriptions, accuracy in reporting, clarity in setting priorities, and the ability to defend logical decisions under pressure. If a leader speaks about prevention but postpones planned work daily in favor of ad hoc repairs, the team quickly notices the inconsistency. This undermines authority faster than a lack of technical knowledge. When the team sees that the leader cares about standards and follows them personally, they are more willing to take responsibility for results. These small elements, over time, create a culture of “we do it right because it matters.”
How to Manage Maintenance?
A culture of accountability starts with clear expectations. In practice, this means transparent roles, work standards, and metrics that show whether the team truly delivers. The Leader’s task is to explain that the objective is not “the number of tasks completed,” but process stability and reduced failures. When expectations are clear, accountability becomes a natural part of the job, not an additional burden.
A strong Leader builds a management rhythm: regular failure reviews, planning meetings, and periodic evaluations of preventive plans. These are the moments when the organization learns from data rather than assumptions. Rhythm ensures that problems are not postponed “for later,” but addressed systemically. In many companies, the lack of such rhythm leads to recurring failures because no one pauses to analyze root causes.
An important competence of a technical Leader is also the ability to recognize talent and build development paths. Maintenance needs not only excellent mechanics, but also data analysts, planners, and people capable of cross-functional collaboration. A Leader who can align roles with people’s potential increases team effectiveness without continuously expanding headcount. This has a direct impact on cost and the quality of Maintenance performance.
Another key element is the development of competencies on both the Leader’s and the team’s side. Maintenance teams often consist of highly experienced individuals, but experience does not always translate into effectiveness and results. In Maintenance, investment typically focuses on technical skills, understandably so, yet managerial and psychological competencies also have a significant impact on the organization.
The technical Leader is also an ambassador of change (often initiated “from above”). Even a well-designed strategy will remain a document without leadership. The Leader is responsible for demonstrating the purpose of change and translating it into practical steps. The Leader’s behavior builds trust that a new operating model is not just a temporary “project.” This is particularly important when an organization transitions from reactive Maintenance to a preventive model, or when implementing a CMMS or EAM system.
Not Everyone Has to Be a Leader
Finally, one more point is worth emphasizing, not everyone has to be a Leader, and that is perfectly acceptable. The leadership path is not intended for everyone, nor should anyone be forced into it to develop professionally. Increasingly, Maintenance departments offer not only vertical promotions for Leaders, but also horizontal career paths focused on developing expert-level competencies.
Summary
A technical Leader (whether Director, Manager, or Supervisor) is not only an expert in machines. The higher the position in the hierarchy, the more they become an architect of culture and priorities. The Leader ensures that the team sees a common goal and understands the purpose of prevention, systems, and analysis. Without such leadership, organizations lack rhythm, and effort disperses into short-term actions.
With strong leadership, technical operations become predictable support for the business. Strong leadership shifts the organization’s mindset from “repairing” to “managing value.” It is this shift that determines sustainable improvement in Maintenance performance.
P.S. Building authority and a culture of accountability is a marathon, not a sprint. Most often, the key factor in this process is the Leader’s internal change and this is where risks emerge: not every Leader is ready for change, and not every team member is ready to operate in a culture of accountability.
If you want to strengthen the authority of technical leaders in your organization, Operivo can support this process through dedicated development programs.
Operivo Sp. z o.o.
Aleja Jana Pawła II 27
00-867 Warsaw
+48 533 373 200
europe@operivo.com
Copyright @ Operivo 2025
Privacy Policy